Legal Opinion

Etco Corp. v. Hauer

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 21, 1984No. A015276PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KLINE, P. J.

—ETCO Corporation (ETCO) appeals from a declaratory judgment holding enforceable a provision of a lease between ETCO, as lessor, and respondent Ellen B. Hauer, as lessee, granting the lessee an option to renew the lease for five years at a rent to be determined by mutual agreement of the parties at the time of exercise of the option, and holding that such rent be established at $1,276 per month. We conclude that the lease provision, which contains no method or standards for determining the rent, is unenforceable and accordingly reverse.

The facts giving rise to this…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Joseph Martin, Jr., Delicatessen, Inc. v. SchumacherNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Garcia v. Truck Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Autry v. Republic Productions, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Ablett v. ClausonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Vangel v. VangelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Okun v. MortonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  2. Patel v. LiebermenschCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
  3. In Re CrummieUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. California · 1996
  4. Robert T. Miner, M.D., INC. v. Tustin Avenue Investors, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  5. Tull v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API