Legal Opinion
Tull v. United States
District Court, E.D. California
Decided January 25, 1994No. Civ. S-90-0994 MLSPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER
MILTON L. SCHWARTZ, Senior District Judge.
I. Factual and Procedural Background.
Plaintiffs filed this action on August 1, 1990, seeking refund of taxes allegedly illegally and erroneously assessed against plaintiff Jacklyn Tull and collected from both plaintiffs by defendant, acting by and through the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”). At all relevant times, plaintiff Jacklyn Tull was Secretary and Treasurer of Hatfield Trucking Company (“Hatfield”) and plaintiff James Tull was her husband. The amounts assessed against plaintiff Jacklyn Tull ($203,904.32)…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Aquilino v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Morgan v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- United States v. BessSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Slodov v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Glass City Bank v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. Stephen C. HemmenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Jacklyn Tull James C. Tull v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Stephen C. HemmenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995