Legal Opinion

Trotzer v. Vig

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided March 24, 2009No. 36626-6-IIPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

203 P.3d 1056 (2009)

Thomas TROTZER, Appellant,

v.

Gary VIG and Sherrie Vig, Respondent.

No. 36626-6-II.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2.

January 13, 2009.

Publication Ordered March 24, 2009.

Peter James Nichols, Attorney at Law, Seattle, WA, for Appellant.

John Robert Bonin, Attorney at Law, Julie K. Cook, Bonin & Cook PS, Shelton, WA, for Respondent(s).

HUNT, J.

¶ 1 Thomas Trotzer, the partially-prevailing plaintiff, appeals the trial court's dismissal of his 2000 trespass action against Gary and Sherrie Vig, denial of his request for treble damages for the Vigs' 2003 timber trespass, and…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. State v. CamarilloWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Sunnyside Valley Irrigation District v. DickieWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Wenatchee Sportsmen Ass'n v. Chelan CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Willener v. SweetingWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Millay v. CamWashington Supreme Court · 1998

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Anne M. Price v. Stacy GonzalezCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
  2. Putz v. GoldenDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2012
  3. Chu-yun Twu, Appellant/cross-respondent v. David Cooke, Respondent/cross-appellantCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
  4. Armone Larshay Hawkins v. City of Federal Way, et al.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2026
  5. Armone Larshay Hawkins v. City of Federal Way, et al.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2026

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API