Legal Opinion

Klingensmith v. Siegal

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 1929PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBirdzell, J.

The plaintiffs brought separate actions against the defendants to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by them which were occasioned by a fire in an apartment or flat building belonging to the defendants. The two actions were tried together and judgments favorable to the plaintiffs were entered upon separate verdicts. Thereafter the defendants moved for ■ judgment non obstante. The motions were denied, and the defendants appeal from the orders.

On February 1, 1927, the plaintiffs in those actions, Mrs. Nlingensmith and Miss Weiss (now Mrs. Heffner), occupied a small room on the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Willis v. MabonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  2. Winters v. City of DuluthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
  3. Tribune Printing & Binding Co. v. BarnesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Gillock v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
  5. McKusick v. Seymour, Sabin & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1892

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Nigro v. FlinnSuperior Court of Delaware · 1937
  2. Ex parte HaleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
  3. Salzseider v. BrunsdaleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Berg v. BergNebraska Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Cabassa v. RiveraSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1948

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API