Legal Opinion

Gomez v. Dooley

District Court, D. South Dakota

Decided May 10, 2021No. 4:21-cv-04085Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA SOUTHERN DIVISION DANIEL JOSE GOMEZ, 4:21-CV-04085-KES Petitioner, vs. ORDER TO SERVE AND TO SHOW CAUSE ROBERT DOOLEY, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA, Respondents. INTRODUCTION Petitioner, Daniel Jose Gomez, a former South Dakota inmate, has filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The pending matter was referred to the magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and the October 16, 2014, standing order of the Honorable Karen E. Schreier, United States District Court Judge. FACTS Mr.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Pace v. DiGuglielmoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  2. Holland v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  3. Duncan v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. Day v. McDonoughSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  5. Hanifi Jihad v. Sheryl Ramstad Hvass, Commissioner of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API