Lilge v. Russell's Trailer Repair, Inc.
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
CHEZEM, Judge.
Casé Summary
Plaintiffs/Appellants/Cross-Appellees, Harry and Betty Lilge, appeal from the trial court’s entry of summary judgment in favor of Defendant/Appellee/Cross-Appel-lant, Russell’s Trailer Repair, Inc. We reverse.
Issues
Appellants present five (5) issues for our review, which we consolidate and restate as follows:
*1148I. Whether there are genuine issues of material fact which precluded the entry of summary judgment for Russell’s.
II. Whether the summary judgment could have been based on the “open and obvious rule.”
III. Whether Lilge incurred the risk of his injuries as a matter…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Huff v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1977
- Moll v. South Central Solar Systems, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1981
- Bemis Co., Inc. v. RubushIndiana Supreme Court · 1981
- Koske v. Townsend Engineering Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1990
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Stump v. Indiana Equipment Co., Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1992
- prod.liab.rep. (Cch) P 15,315 Naomi Whitaker v. T.J. Snow Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
- Schooley v. Ingersoll Rand, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1994
- United of Omaha v. HieberIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
- McDonald v. Fairfield Pathologists, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1991
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.