Legal Opinion
Poulos v. Caesars World, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 10, 2004No. 02-16604PublishedCited by 64 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McKEOWN, Circuit Judge:
This permissive interlocutory appeal comes to us from a denial of class certification in a lawsuit involving the gaming industry. Proposed class representatives, William H. Poulos, Brenda McElmore, and Larry Schreier (“Class Representatives”), challenge an alleged “scheme to defraud patrons of gambling casinos” by a group of over sixty gaming machine manufacturers and the casino and cruise ship operators that use the machines (“the Casinos”). The proposed classes encompass nearly everyone who has played video poker or electronic slot machines within the last fifteen…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Burford v. Sun Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Quackenbush v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Holmes v. Securities Investor Protection CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- Manuel De Jesus Ortega Melendr v. Joseph M. ArpaioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Holocaust Victims of v. OTP BankCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
- In re Pharmaceutical Industry Average Wholesale Price LitigationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2005
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. VaughnCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Poulos v. Caesars World, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.