Legal Opinion
Poulos v. Caesars World, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 10, 2004No. 02-16604PublishedCited by 64 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
379 F.3d 654
William H. POULOS; Brenda McElmore; Larry Schreier, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
CAESARS WORLD, INC.; Sigma Game, Inc.; International Game Technology; Argosy Gaming Co., Aztar Corporation; Bally Entertainment; Boyd Gaming Corporation; Boyd Mississippi; Casino America; Casino Magic Corporation; Circus Circus Enterprises, Inc.; Claridge at Park Place; Elsinore Corporation; Gold Mine Casino; Gold River Hotel & Casino Corporation; Grand Casinos, Inc.; Harrah's Entertainment, Inc.; Hilton Hotels Corporation; Hollywood Casino; Hyatt…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Burford v. Sun Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Quackenbush v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Holmes v. Securities Investor Protection CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- Sosa v. DIRECTV, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Al-Kidd v. AshcroftCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- CGC Holding Co. v. Broad & CasselCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
- The Arc of California v. Toby DouglasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- In re Conagra Foods, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2015
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.