Legal Opinion

Townsend v. Coxe

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 1894PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Lake County; the Hon. Clark W. Upton, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wilkin

On the 16th of December, 1891, appellees, residents of Pennsylvania and New York, sued out of the Circuit Court of Lake county a writ of attachment against “The Had-field Company,” a Wisconsin corporation, doing business at Waukesha, in that State, and caused the same to be levied upon a ten-acre tract of land situated in Lake county. Subsequently appellant filed an intervening petition, setting up that “The Hadfield Company,” on the 15th of December, 1891, had, in Wisconsin, “made and delivered to him a deed of assignment to all its property, real and personal, in trust, to pay creditors,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Barth v. . BackusNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  2. Rhawn v. PearceIllinois Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Heyer v. AlexanderIllinois Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Upton v. HubbardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1859
  5. May v. First National BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1887

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Luick v. ArendsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Holbrook v. FordIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Segnitz v. Garden City Banking & Trust Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Cross v. Brown, Steese & ClarkeSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1895
  5. Moore v. Land, Title & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1896

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API