Legal Opinion
Harrosh v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency
District Court, E.D. California
Decided September 7, 2023No. 2:21-cv-01969Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 Michael Harrosh, No. 2:21-cv-01969-KJM-JDP 12 Plaintiff, ORDER 13 v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency, et al., 1S Defendants. 16 17 In their pending cross-motions for summary judgment, the parties advance competing 18 | iterpretations of the Tahoe Regional Planning Compact between Nevada and California 19 | approved by Congress under the Compacts Clause. Plaintiff Michael Harrosh contends the Tahoe 20 | Regional Planning Compact unambiguously requires five affirmative votes by the California 21 |…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council, Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning AgencySupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Clinton v. BabbittCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Albert Alto v. Kenneth SalazarCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power District v. LeeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Tarrant Regional Water Dist. v. HerrmannSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.