Legal Opinion
City of Minot v. Rudolph
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided December 16, 2008No. 20080135PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KAPSNER, Justice.
[¶ 1] Kirby Rudolph appeals from a criminal judgment entered upon his conditional guilty plea to driving under the influence of an intoxicating liquor (“DUI”). Because we conclude that the City of Minot was permitted to contract with the Ward County State’s Attorney’s office to prosecute municipal offenses, we affirm.
I
[¶2] In April 2007, Rudolph was arrested for DUI in Minot, and the City of Minot, through a uniform complaint and summons, charged him with DUI in municipal court. After a request by Rudolph in *732June 2007, the prosecution was transferred to district court. In…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- GO Committee Ex Rel. Hale v. City of MinotNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- Haugland v. City of BismarckNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
- Mini Mart, Inc. v. City of MinotNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
- Litten v. City of FargoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
- Hentz v. Elma Township Board of SupervisorsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- City of Fargo v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2024
- Klug v. City of MinotNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. NormanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- City of Minot v. RudolphNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008