Legal Opinion

Hentz v. Elma Township Board of Supervisors

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 5, 2007No. 20060198PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROTHERS, Justice.

[¶ 1] Brandan and Troy Hentz (“the Hentzes”) appealed from the district court’s dismissal of their appeal from the Elma Township Zoning Commission’s (“the Township”) findings that they violated a zoning ordinance by planting trees too close to county roads. We reverse the district court’s judgment after concluding the Township’s decision was unreasonable, and we remand to the Township to vacate its February 12, 2006 Order.

I

[¶ 2] The relevant facts are undisputed. The Hentzes are tree farmers who own trees planted for the purposes of tree farming. Some of the trees were…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. GO Committee Ex Rel. Hale v. City of MinotNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Tibert v. City of MintoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Graber v. Logan County Water Resource BoardNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Gullickson v. Stark County Board of County CommissionersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Pic v. City of GraftonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Hagerott v. Morton County Board of CommissionersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Gowan v. Ward County CommissionNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  3. City of Minot v. BogerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Mertz v. City of Elgin, Grant CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Arnegard v. Arnegard TownshipNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API