Legal Opinion
City of Minot v. Rudolph
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided December 16, 2008No. 20080135Published
1Opinion of the Court
758 N.W.2d 731 (2008)
2008 ND 231
CITY OF MINOT, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Kirby Clarence RUDOLPH, Defendant and Appellant.
No. 20080135.
Supreme Court of North Dakota.
December 16, 2008.
Kelly Ann Dillon, City Prosecutor, Minot, N.D., for plaintiff and appellee.
Danny Lee Herbel, Bismarck, N.D., for defendant and appellant.
KAPSNER, Justice.
[¶ 1] Kirby Rudolph appeals from a criminal judgment entered upon his conditional guilty plea to driving under the influence of an intoxicating liquor ("DUI"). Because we conclude that the City of Minot was permitted to contract with the Ward County State's…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- GO Committee Ex Rel. Hale v. City of MinotNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- Haugland v. City of BismarckNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
- Mini Mart, Inc. v. City of MinotNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
- Litten v. City of FargoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
- Hentz v. Elma Township Board of SupervisorsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.