Legal Opinion

Weigel v. Brown

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided March 11, 1912No. 3,645PublishedCited by 8 opinions

In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Arkansas. Action by Antone Brown against E. N. Weigel. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

SANBORN, Circuit Judge.

The laws of the state of Arkansas empower the county court of any county in that state to let the labor of persons convicted and sentenced to the county jail to a contractor on condition that he agrees to maintain, keep, and work them (sections 1080 et sec]., Kirby’s Digest 1904), and they authorize the contractor to whip any such prisoner with a strap 2 feet long and 3j4 inches wide, attached to a wooden handle, with 10 licks once in 24 hours for his refusal to work. Rule 3 of the Prison Board. The county court of Pulaski county made a contract of this nature with the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Dynes v. HooverSupreme Court of the United States · 1858
  2. William H. Tracy and John B. Balestier, in Error v. Samuel SwartwoutSupreme Court of the United States · 1836
  3. Sandford v. NicholsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1816
  4. Times Pub. Co. v. CarlisleCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1899
  5. McIntosh v. Bullard, Earnheart & MagnessSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Richardson v. McKnightSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Taylor v. GilmartinCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1982
  3. People v. NilesIllinois Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Taylor v. GilmartinCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1982
  5. Richardson v. McKnightSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API