Legal Opinion · Dissent

Pinckney Community Schools v. Continental Casualty Co.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided September 22, 1995No. Docket 163986Published

1DissentCavanagh, P.J.

I respectfully dissent. Defendant’s policy provided coverage only for claims made "during the policy period.” Thus, the policy is a "claims-made” policy. In general, a claims-made policy provides coverage no matter when the alleged error, omission, or act of negligence occurred, as long as the misdeed is discovered and the claim for indemnity is made within the policy period. Stine v Continental Casualty Co, 419 Mich 89, 97; 349 NW2d 127 (1984). The issue presented therefore is whether Rutherford’s allegation of discrimination in 1981 constituted a claim for a wrongful act within the meaning…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Auto-Owners Insurance v. ChurchmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Allstate Insurance v. FreemanMichigan Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Michigan Millers Mutual Insurance v. Bronson Plating Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Group Insurance v. CzopekMichigan Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Stine v. Continental Casualty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1984

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API