Legal Opinion
M & W Contractors, Inc. v. Arch Mineral Corporation
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided December 30, 1971No. Civ. A. 71-252PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
KINNEARY, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the motions of the defendants Arch Mineral Corporation and Eads Coal Company to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction over the person of the defendants, and for insufficiency of process. These motions are made under the provisions of Rule 12(b) (2) and (4).
The jurisdiction of this Court is invoked under the provisions of Title 28, United States Code, Section 1332. In this action based on a contract entered into between the plaintiff and the defendants, plaintiff seeks declaratory and injunctive relief and damages.
Plaintiff…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Southern MacHine Company, Inc. v. Mohasco Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968
- Fourth Northwestern National Bank v. Hilson Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
- McQuay, Inc. v. Samuel Schlosberg, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1971
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Jurko v. Jobs Europe AgencyOhio Court of Appeals · 1975
- Hall v. TuckerOhio Court of Appeals · 2005
- Graham Engineering Corp. v. Kemp Products Ltd.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1976
- National City Bank v. YevuOhio Court of Appeals · 2008
- Sky v. Van Der WesthuizenOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.