Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Thompson

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 12, 1971No. Appeal, No. 131PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Me. Justice Robeets,

In this appeal, appellant Ervin Thompson asserts, inter alia, that he was denied the fundamentals of due process at his nonjury trial because he was foreclosed from presenting evidence on his behalf. Our examination of the record reveals appellant’s trial fell below requisite minimum standards of due process, and accordingly a new trial is ordered.

The circumstances surrounding appellant’s conviction are as follows. Thompson was indicted on charges of carrying a concealed deadly weapon and larceny of a motor vehicle. He pleaded not guilty on the larceny bill, and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cafeteria & Restaurant Workers Union, Local 473 v. McElroySupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. McKeiver v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Wiley v. WoodsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  4. Conestoga National Bank v. PattersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  5. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Light v. MaroneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. WrightSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  2. Commonwealth v. TurnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  3. Lyness v. Com., State Bd. of MedicineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. Commonwealth v. PotterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. Commonwealth v. DevlinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API