Legal Opinion

In re Shetterly

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided April 15, 1931No. 2670PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBland, Judge

This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals affirming the action of the examiner in refusing to allow a patent for “ the ornamental design for sheet glass as shown.”

The so-called design is to be found on one surface of glass such as is ordinarily used in office partitions, etc., and has for one of its purposes the obstruction of the rays of light so as to make the glass translucent rather than transparent.

The reference cited by the examiner and the Board of Appeals is Burgess (Design) 18647, October 2, 1888, for wall paper.

In the rejection of the claim of the application by…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gorham Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  2. Harmon Paper Co. v. Kimberly Clark Co.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1922

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Waldman v. SwanfeldtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API