Legal Opinion

Harmon Paper Co. v. Kimberly Clark Co.

District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Decided May 15, 1922No. Nos. 1123, 1124PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GEIGER, District Judge.

These two suits, charge infringement of letters patent No. 1,344,570, June 22, 1920, covering “wall paper and method of making it”; patent No. 1,344,603, June 22, 1920, covering “paper-making apparatus” ; and patent No. 54,152, November 4, 1919, covering “design for wall paper”—all issued to Warren.

Upon the trial of the cases it was conceded that the first noted is the dominant patent, and it will be thus considered. The invention relates “to methods of making wall paper with a cloud effect of *502visionary depth,” and it also relates to the wall paper produced by such…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. American Grass Twine Co. v. ChoateCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1907

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Blumcraft Of Pittsburgh v. Citizens And Southern National Bank Of South CarolinaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1969
  2. In re StirlingCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931
  3. American Merri-Lei Corp. v. F. W. Woolworth Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1929
  4. Blumcraft of Pittsburgh v. Citizens & Southern National BankCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1969
  5. In re ShetterlyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API