Legal Opinion

Waldman v. Swanfeldt

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 24, 1933No. 6818Published

1Opinion of the Court

NORCROSS, District Judge.

This is an appeal from a decree holding United States letters patent 1,625,690; issued to appellee, plaintiff below, for “ornamental awning fabric and method of making the same,” valid and infringed, and directing the usual accounting of profits and damages. Swanfeldt v. Waldman (D. C.) 50 F.(2d) 445. Appellant in his answer denied appellee was the inventor of any such new and useful fabric and method of making the same, and alleged that said patent is void for want of patentable invention.

Appellant contends that on its face the patent is not for either of the objects…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Gorham Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  2. Cochrane v. DeenerSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. Harmon Paper Co. v. PragerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1923
  4. Weisgerber v. ClowneyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey · 1904
  5. Armstrong Cork Co. v. W. & J. Sloane Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1928

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API