Legal Opinion

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Joseph M. Capistrant

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided August 18, 2015No. 2014AP002535-DPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

¶ 1. We review Referee Daniel L. Icenogle's recommendation that the court suspend the Wisconsin law license of Attorney Joseph M. Capistrant for a period of 90 days for professional misconduct. The referee also recommended that Attorney Capistrant pay the costs of the proceeding, which total $574.94 as of June 1, 2015.

¶ 2. Because no appeal has been filed, we review the referee's report pursuant to Supreme Court Rule (SCR) 22.17(2). After conducting our independent review of the matter, we agree with the referee that, based on Attorney Capistrant's failure to answer the complaint filed by the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against WiduleWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
  2. In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against EisenbergWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  3. In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against GradyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. File v. KastnerDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2020
  2. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Joseph M. CapistrantWisconsin Supreme Court · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API