Legal Opinion
Aliano v. LaMaina
New York Supreme Court
Decided March 31, 1998PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
F. Dana Winslow, J.
The plaintiff’s cross motion for an order striking the defendant’s demand for a jury trial; the defendant’s cross motion for an order permitting him to file a jury demand and, *976inter alia, granting him leave to reargue a prior order of the court, dated September 30, 1997, are decided as follows:
The defendant’s cross motion for leave to file a jury demand is denied. The plaintiff’s cross motion for an order striking the defendant’s demand for a jury trial is granted. The defendant’s cross motion for an order granting him leave to reargue is denied. The…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Rokina Optical Co. v. Camera King, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
- McClelland v. Climax Hosiery MillsNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Amusement Business Underwriters v. American International Group, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Bay Ridge Lumber Co. v. GroenendaalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Seamon v. ApelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Nicoletti v. Ozram Transportation, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Yellow Trading Ltd. v. Fratelli Ricatto Import & Export Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001