McCarty v. Cunningham
Supreme Court of Missouri
Appeal from, Jasper Circuit Court. — Hon. Joseph Cravens, J udge.
1Opinion of the CourtNorton, J.
Notwithstanding the positive injunction of the statute that exceptions must.be filed during the term at which they are taken, and not after, it has been held by this court that a bill of exceptions may be filed after the expiration of the term, provided the parties consent thereto and the court so orders. Robart v. Long, 65 Mo. 223; Peake v. Bell, 65 Mo. 224; West v. Fowler, 59 Mo. 40. The bill of exceptions in this case was not filed , during the term, and although the consent of parties that it might be filed in vacation appears, there is no order of court based upon such consent…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- West v. FowlerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1875
- Peake v. BellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1877
- Robart v. LongSupreme Court of Missouri · 1877
3Cited by9 opinions
- Rine v. Chicago & Alton RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1885
- Smith v. Ohio Millers Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1928
- Carter v. PriorSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
- Taylor v. NewmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
- Sinclair v. City of BolivarMissouri Court of Appeals · 1885
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.