Robart v. Long
Supreme Court of Missouri
Frror to St. Francois Circuit Court.—Hon. Louis E. Dinning, Judge.
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam :
It is the settled law of this State that a bill of exceptions must be prepared and signed during the term, unless the court, by consent of the parties, orders otherwise. As the record shows that the plaintiff in this case is allowed sixty days after trial within which to pre.pare his bill, and no consent of the defendant appears on the record, the bill of exceptions must be disregarded and the judgment be affirmed.
Aeeirmed.
2Cited by3 opinions
- Carter v. PriorSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
- McCarty v. CunninghamSupreme Court of Missouri · 1882
- Bank of North America v. FletcherMissouri Court of Appeals · 1884