Hanson Engineers Inc. v. Uneco, Inc.
District Court, C.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MILLS, District Judge.
In this breach of contract case, Defendant moves to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction and improper venue.
But the forum selection clause in the contract provides for suit where the “plaintiff’ is “located.”
Because the Plaintiff in this case has its corporate offices in the Central District of Illinois and is thus “located” here, the motion must be denied.
This cause comes before the Court on several motions: UNECO’S motion to dismiss, UNECO’s motion for leave to file a reply to the response to the motion to dismiss, and Hanson’s motion for leave to file a…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Northwestern National Insurance Company v. William F. DonovanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- John Ryan, on Behalf of Himself and a Class of Others Similarly Situated v. Chromalloy American CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Easterling v. American Optical Corp.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2000
- United Financial Mortgage Corp. v. Bayshores Funding Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2002
- AXA Equitable Life Insurance v. Infinity Financial Group, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2009
- Advanced Critical Devices, Inc. v. Boston Scientific CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2022
- In re Pilgrim's Pride Corporation Derivative LitigationCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2019