Legal Opinion
In Re Arrow Transp. Co. of Delaware
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Oregon
Decided July 17, 1998No. 14-31522PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
POLLY S. HIGDON, Chief Judge.
The debtor has filed a motion for summary judgment on its objection to the proof of claims filed by the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Tankhaul Division, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local 81 and International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local 162. (“The Union Group”). The original claims contained several identical bases for payment including a claim under the WARN Act. All but two have now been resolved. The parties still disagree on the extent to which the Union Group’s claim for accrued prepetition vacation pay should be…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Christiansburg Garment Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Fogerty v. Fantasy, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Independent Federation of Flight Attendants v. ZipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Corcoran v. Columbia BroadcastIng System, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1941
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Beckman v. WilcoxCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999
- Alberts v. Nash Finch Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2007
- Preston Trucking Co. v. Liquidity Solutions, Inc. (In Re Preston Trucking Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland · 2005