Legal Opinion
Davila v. Secure Pharmacy Plus
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided August 4, 2004No. 3:02CV652(MRK)(WIG)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON PENDING MOTIONS
KRAVITZ, District Judge.
Pending before the Court are three applications for prejudgment remedy filed by Plaintiff and two motions to dismiss filed by Defendant. The Court will address each in turn.
I. Motions for Applications for Prejudgment Remedy [docs. ## 7k, 76]
Plaintiff has filed two essentially identical motions seeking a prejudgment remedy in the amount of $1,250,000.00 against Defendant pursuant to Rule 64 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Connecticut General Statutes § 52-278a. Rule 64 permits a plaintiff in federal court to utilize available state…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Griffin v. BreckenridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Hathaway v. CoughlinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Thomas v. RoachCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- McDonald v. Head Criminal Court Supervisor OfficerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- Mian v. Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette Securities Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Baltas v. DonesDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2022
- Breton v. LamontDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2021
- Crispin v. RoachDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2020
- Jordan v. GiffordDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2023