Reynolds Electrical & Engineering Co. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Ford, Judge:
The merchandise, the dutiable value of which is here involved, is invoiced as “300 KVA Transofrmers [sic] 3 Phase, 60-Cycle 44000/2400/600 Volts indoor Type.” The merchandise was invoiced at a value of $3,360, plus a commission of $1,400, entered at a total value of $4,750, and “Appraised as a whole at $6750.00 US Funds net packed.”
Counsel for the plaintiff raises no question concerning the item of $1,400 paid by the Chicago Electric Co. of Chicago to Guy Morton of ■Canada for his services in the procurement of the involved merchandise, this item evidently being recognized as a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Stein v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1910
- United States v. BauerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
- Vandiver v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
- United States v. Canada Packers, Ltd.United States Customs Court · 1942
- Wool Novelty Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1948
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. Heyman Co.United States Customs Court · 1963
- Allied Food Corp. of America v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952