Legal Opinion

Reynolds Electrical & Engineering Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided April 13, 1951No. 7983; Entry No. 138PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ford, Judge:

The merchandise, the dutiable value of which is here involved, is invoiced as “300 KVA Transofrmers [sic] 3 Phase, 60-Cycle 44000/2400/600 Volts indoor Type.” The merchandise was invoiced at a value of $3,360, plus a commission of $1,400, entered at a total value of $4,750, and “Appraised as a whole at $6750.00 US Funds net packed.”

Counsel for the plaintiff raises no question concerning the item of $1,400 paid by the Chicago Electric Co. of Chicago to Guy Morton of ■Canada for his services in the procurement of the involved merchandise, this item evidently being recognized as a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Stein v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1910
  2. United States v. BauerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
  3. Vandiver v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
  4. United States v. Canada Packers, Ltd.United States Customs Court · 1942
  5. Wool Novelty Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1948

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. Heyman Co.United States Customs Court · 1963
  2. Allied Food Corp. of America v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API