Wool Novelty Co. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Tilson, Judge:
The two appeals listed above, which were consolidated for trial, involve the proper dutiable values of cotton and wool tapestries, exported from Shanghai; China, in March and September 1941. The plaintiff confines its contention to the claim that certain amounts stated on the invoices to be buying commissions are not properly a part of the dutiable values of the merchandise and therefore should not have been included as such by the appraiser. In appeal No. 141784-A the commission is 10 per centum, and plaintiff’s claim is limited to the merchandise contained in cases 825 to 828,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Stein v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1910
- United States v. BauerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
- Vandiver v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
3Cited by2 opinions
- Reynolds Electrical & Engineering Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1951
- United States v. Wool Novelty Co.United States Customs Court · 1949