Legal Opinion

Wool Novelty Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided June 16, 1948No. 7600; Entry Nos. 758204; 720384PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Tilson, Judge:

The two appeals listed above, which were consolidated for trial, involve the proper dutiable values of cotton and wool tapestries, exported from Shanghai; China, in March and September 1941. The plaintiff confines its contention to the claim that certain amounts stated on the invoices to be buying commissions are not properly a part of the dutiable values of the merchandise and therefore should not have been included as such by the appraiser. In appeal No. 141784-A the commission is 10 per centum, and plaintiff’s claim is limited to the merchandise contained in cases 825 to 828,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Stein v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1910
  2. United States v. BauerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
  3. Vandiver v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Reynolds Electrical & Engineering Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1951
  2. United States v. Wool Novelty Co.United States Customs Court · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API