Legal Opinion

United States v. Heyman Co.

United States Customs Court

Decided June 10, 1963No. A.R.D. 157; Entry Nos. 726378; 745184; 752531PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Richardson, Judge:

This is an application for review of the decision and judgment of a single judge sitting in reappraisement and holding that export value of similar merchandise is the proper dutiable value of the involved merchandise. From the judgment entered on February 1, 1962, and reported in 48 Cust. Ct. 533, Reap. Dec. 10157, the defendant appeals.

The involved merchandise consists of so-called sisal pads, composed of 100 per centum henequen fiber, about % inch in thickness and weighing approximately 3 ounces per square foot. The merchandise was produced in Merida, Yucatan, Mexico, by…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. New England Foil Corp.United States Customs Court · 1943
  2. United States v. F. C. Gerlach & Co.United States Customs Court · 1941
  3. Allied Food Corp. of America v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952
  4. Reynolds Electrical & Engineering Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1951
  5. United States v. Canada Packers, Ltd.United States Customs Court · 1942

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Josef Mfg., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  2. United States v. Josef Mfg., Ltd.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972
  3. Vicki Enterprises, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971
  4. United States v. Josef Mfg., Ltd.United States Customs Court · 1970
  5. A. W. Fenton Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API