Legal Opinion

Brown v. Minshall

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 13, 1921No. 11512PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error from District -Court, Tulsa County; Owen Owen, Judge. Action by Louisa Brown against E. R. Minshall and others to recover interest in land. Demurrer of the defendants to the ■plaintiffs’ petition sustained. Judgment entered dismissing the action of the plaintiff.

1Opinion of the CourtKiBNNAMElR, J.

This action was commenced ■ by Louisa ■ Brown, as plaintiff, against E. R. Minshall, H. W. Phillips, J. P. -Sweeney, L. R. Lewis, and the Prairie Oil and Gas Company, defendants, in the district court of Tulsa county for possession of -an undivided one-fourth interest in the lands described in- the petition Of the plaintiff. This -cause 'was consolidated with- cause No. 11523, E. R. Minshall et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. Willie Berryhill, Defendant in Error,’ this day decided [83 Okla. 100], The lands involved in this controversy are part of the same allotment as that involved in cause No.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Tiger v. Western Investment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Parker v. RichardSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  3. Goodrum v. BuffaloCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1908
  4. Starr v. Long JimSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  5. Gannon v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Crosbie v. PartridgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  2. Bilby v. MaloneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  3. Neal v. Travelers Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  4. Probert v. KibbySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  5. Thomas v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API