Legal Opinion
CARTIER, a DIV. OF RICHEMONT NO. AMER. v. Symbolix
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 29, 2006No. 05 Civ. 2777(RJH)PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINON AND ORDER
HOLWELL, District Judge.
On March 11, 2005, plaintiffs Cartier, a division of Richemont North America, Inc., and Cartier International, B.V. (collectively “Cartier” or “plaintiffs”) initiated litigation against defendants Symbolix, Inc., d/b/a Park Cities Jewelers, its principal, Ahmed M. Saleh, and John Does 1-5 (collectively “defendants”), alleging trademark infringement and false designation of origin under § 32(1) and § 43(a)(1) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. 1114(1) and 1125(a)(1) respectively. These claims relate to Cartier’s Tank Frangaise line of watches. On…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Polaroid Corporation v. Polarad Electronics CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
- Doe Lang, Petitioner/defendant-Appellant v. Retirement Living Publishing Co., Inc., Respondent/plaintiff-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Ognibene v. ParkesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
- Sussman-Automatic Corp. v. Spa World Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 2014
- Ognibene v. ParkesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- Cartier v. Symbolix Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- Ognibene v. ParkesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.