Legal Opinion

Ognibene v. Parkes

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided February 6, 2009No. 08 Civ. 1335(LTS)(TDK)PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion and Order

LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, District Judge.

Plaintiffs 1 bring this action for declaratory and injunctive relief against Defendants alleging that certain provisions of New York City’s political campaign finance and lobby laws violate the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution of the United States and the Voting Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1973. Specifically, Plaintiffs allege that certain recently-enacted amendments to the New York City Administrative Code (“Administrative Code”), commonly known as the “pay-to-play” rules, which reduce to levels below the generally-applicable…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Rosenberger v. Rector & Visitors of University of VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Davis v. Federal Election CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 2008

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Ognibene v. ParkesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
  2. Tapper v. HearnCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016
  3. Alba Vineyard and Winery v. New York State Liquor AuthorityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2024
  4. Ognibene v. ParkesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
  5. Ognibene v. ParkesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API