People Ex Rel. Dunbar v. Weinstein
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Frantz
Respondent, to whom we will refer as Weinstein, was informed against by “Complaint in Original Proceedings for Disbarment” filed in this court by the Attorney General of the State of Colorado.
*542The pertinent facts alleged in the complaint are: That respondent at all times mentioned therein was an attorney at law, duly licensed as such by the Supreme Court of Colorado; that in 1953 an action was filed against Weinstein and others to recover treble damages on a claim for excess interest in the sum of $950.61, allegedly collected by defendants in connection with a loan made by them to the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Gould v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1930
- People v. HealdSupreme Court of Colorado · 1951
- People Ex Rel. Colorado Bar Ass'n v. MarshallSupreme Court of Colorado · 1931
3Cited by7 opinions
- In Re the Suspension of the Right to Practice Law of PalmerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- People v. GibbonsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1965
- People v. BellSupreme Court of Colorado · 1962
- In Re the Suspension of the Right to Practice Law of PalmerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- People Ex Rel. Dunbar v. WeinsteinSupreme Court of Colorado · 1957
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.