Legal Opinion

In Re the Suspension of the Right to Practice Law of Palmer

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 16, 1979No. 90Published

1Opinion of the Court

252 S.E.2d 784 (1979)

296 N.C. 638

In the Matter of the suspension of the right to practice law of William Cornelius PALMER.

No. 90.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 16, 1979.

Atty. Gen. Rufus L. Edmisten by Associate Atty. Gen. Joan H. Byers, Raleigh, for the State.

McElwee, Hall & McElwee by William H. McElwee, III, North Wilkesboro, and Robert A. Melott, for appellee.

Harold D. Coley, Jr., Raleigh, amicus curiae, for The North Carolina State Bar.

BRITT, Justice.

The first question for our consideration is whether Judge Snepp's order is reviewable by the appellate division. We hold that it is.

In…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

Louisiana State Bar Association v. EdwinsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1976
United States ex rel. Wilcox v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
In Re PennicaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1962
In Re BurtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
In Re the Discipline of LittleWashington Supreme Court · 1952

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.