State v. Stevens
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Dissent
Katz, J.,
with whom Berdon, J., joins, dissenting. Because I believe that General Statutes § 14-227b (b) authorizes only police officers to order intoxication tests and that Officer Diamanti ceased to have the authority of a police officer when he crossed the Rhode Island border, I respectfully dissent. The state introduced the results of the defendant’s blood test into evidence to prove intoxication pursuant to General Statutes § 14-227b (b).1 Section 14-227b (b) grants to police officers the authority to request a blood, breath or urine test to determine if a driver is intoxicated. Unlike…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- State v. FlemingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Commonwealth v. GullickMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
- Volck v. MuzioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Matter of GriffithsIdaho Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. MillerConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.