Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Stevens

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided February 23, 1993No. 14525Published

1Dissent

Katz, J.,

with whom Berdon, J., joins, dissenting. Because I believe that General Statutes § 14-227b (b) authorizes only police officers to order intoxication tests and that Officer Diamanti ceased to have the authority of a police officer when he crossed the Rhode Island border, I respectfully dissent. The state introduced the results of the defendant’s blood test into evidence to prove intoxication pursuant to General Statutes § 14-227b (b).1 Section 14-227b (b) grants to police officers the authority to request a blood, breath or urine test to determine if a driver is intoxicated. Unlike…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State v. FlemingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
  2. Commonwealth v. GullickMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  3. Volck v. MuzioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  4. Matter of GriffithsIdaho Supreme Court · 1987
  5. State v. MillerConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API