Legal Opinion

State v. Miller

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided September 22, 1992No. 10071PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHeiman, J.

The defendant, Jonathan Miller, appeals from a judgment of conviction, rendered after a conditional plea of nolo contendere; see General Statutes § 54-94a;1 to criminal possession of a pistol, revolver or electronic defense weapon in violation of General Statutes § 53a-217. He claims that the trial court improperly denied his motion to suppress a revolver that the police seized from the trunk of his car. We reverse the trial court’s judgment.

The facts necessary to resolve this appeal are as follows. On March 17, 1990, at about 10 p.m., Elizer Negron, his six year old son and his eighteen year…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Norcott; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Daly.

2Cases cited82 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. State v. MillerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  2. State v. DeFuscoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  3. State v. ScottSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008
  4. State v. LeonardConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
  5. State v. LawsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API