State v. Ranquist
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED OPINION 1
McHUGH, Judge:
T1 The State appeals from an order dismissing, with prejudice, charges against Defendant Lloyd Ranquist for possession of a controlled substance (methamphetamine), a first degree felony, and possession of drug paraphernalia, a class A misdemeanor. See Utah Code Ann. §§ 58-87-8(2), (4), 58-37a-5 (2002 & Supp.2004). The State contends that the trial court improperly suppressed evidence obtained upon execution of a warrant issued on the basis of amphetamine residue found in Defendant's curbside garbage five days before the warrant was issued. Because we conclude…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. ThurmanUtah Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. BrakeUtah Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. DecorsoUtah Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. MarklandUtah Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. HansenUtah Supreme Court · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. DespainCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2007
- State v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2007
- State v. RevueltaCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2026