Legal Opinion

State v. Ranquist

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided November 10, 2005No. 20040835-CAPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMENDED OPINION 1

McHUGH, Judge:

T1 The State appeals from an order dismissing, with prejudice, charges against Defendant Lloyd Ranquist for possession of a controlled substance (methamphetamine), a first degree felony, and possession of drug paraphernalia, a class A misdemeanor. See Utah Code Ann. §§ 58-87-8(2), (4), 58-37a-5 (2002 & Supp.2004). The State contends that the trial court improperly suppressed evidence obtained upon execution of a warrant issued on the basis of amphetamine residue found in Defendant's curbside garbage five days before the warrant was issued. Because we conclude…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. ThurmanUtah Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. BrakeUtah Supreme Court · 2004
  3. State v. DecorsoUtah Supreme Court · 1999
  4. State v. MarklandUtah Supreme Court · 2005
  5. State v. HansenUtah Supreme Court · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. DespainCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2007
  2. State v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2007
  3. State v. RevueltaCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API