Legal Opinion

Gentila v. Pace, Secretary of the Army

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided March 3, 1952No. 10839PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EDGERTON, Circuit Judge.

Appellant’s complaint filed by his mother as next friend, for a mandatory injunction against the Secretary of the Army makes these assertions:

Appellant was inducted into the army in 1942. He went absent without leave in 1943 and returned to duty in 1944. He was then given a dishonorable discharge under a medical officer’s diagnosis, “the record indicating a mental condition.” His discharge was “based upon desertion and physical fitness” (sic; unfitness must be meant). He “at no time was tried for the offense of desertion.” He “was discharged without an opportunity to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Morgan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Switchmen's Union v. National Mediation BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. McGrath v. KristensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  4. Reid v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  5. Bolger v. Marshall, Secretary of National DefenseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Mitchell Van Bourg v. Paul H. Nitze, Secretary of the NavyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
  2. Marshall v. WymanDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1955
  3. John H. Harmon, III v. Wilber M. Brucker, Individually and as Secretary of the Department of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1957
  4. Harmon v. BruckerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1956
  5. Bernstein v. HerrenDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1956

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API