Legal Opinion

Bernstein v. Herren

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided March 8, 1956PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RYAN, District Judge.

Plaintiffs and defendant have both moved for summary judgment. Plaintiffs are soldiers of the United States Army presently stationed at Fort Dix, New Jersey, and in the service following induction under the Universal Military Training Act of 1950, 50 U.S.C.A. Appendix, § 451 et seq. The defendant, Lieutenant General, is the Commanding General of the First Army area, within which Fort Dix is located.

This suit was filed under Section 2201, Title 28 U.S.C.A., for a declaratory judgment; jurisdiction is alleged under the Constitution and the Universal Military Training Act of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Joint Anti-Fascist Refugee Committee v. McGrathSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Marshall v. WymanDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1955
  3. Davis v. WoodringCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
  4. Patterson v. LambSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  5. Bernstein v. HerrenDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1956

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Reed v. FrankeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1961
  2. John H. Harmon, III v. Wilber M. Brucker, Individually and as Secretary of the Department of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1957
  3. Michaelson v. HerrenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
  4. Reed v. FrankeDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1960
  5. Reed v. FrankeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1961

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API