Legal Opinion

Bateham v. Public School Employees' Retirement Fund Board

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 1, 1952No. Calendar 45,029PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNorth, C. J.

The 2 plaintiffs in this original proceeding in this Court seek mandamus to compel the Michigan public school employees’ retirement fund board, which consists of the individually named defendants, to construe PA 1945, No 136, as amended (CL 1948, § 38.201 et seq. [Stat Ann 1949 Cum Supp § 15.893(1) et seq.~\), in such a manner as will enable each of the plaintiffs to qualify for receipt of “service retirement allowance.” The retirement board had previously disallowed the petition of the respective plaintiffs for such retirement allowances.

At the outset, in the appended footnote, * we quote…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Coffman v. State Board of Examiners in OptometryMichigan Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Argo Oil Corporation v. AtwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
  3. McLeod v. State Board of CanvassersMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Beaver Dam Coal Co. v. HockerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924
  5. Sherrod v. Lawrenceburg School CityIndiana Supreme Court · 1938

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pillon v. Attorney GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Carroll v. Universal Irrigation, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1977
  3. Opinion No. 70-237 (1970) Ag, Oklahoma Attorney General Reports1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API