Legal Opinion

Carroll v. Universal Irrigation, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided December 28, 1977No. 1855-3PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGreen, J.

Plaintiff commenced this action against defendants to recover under the Alaska Workmen's Compensation Act for injuries incurred in that state. Defendants appeal from a judgment for plaintiff.

Alaska refused to waive jurisdiction and the parties stipulated that the claim was governed by the workmen's compensation laws in Alaska. Under the act, plaintiff was allowed to either (1) claim statutory compensation benefits, or (2) file an action for damages against his employer, since no premiums had been paid on his behalf. Plaintiff elected to pursue the latter course.

Defendants assign error to the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Kaatz v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Laborers & Hod Carriers Union, Local No. 341 v. GroothuisAlaska Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Searfus v. Northern Gas CompanyAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Ostrem v. Alaska Workmen's Compensation BoardAlaska Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Haman v. Allied Concrete Products, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1972

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Grothe v. OlafsonAlaska Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Sonners, Inc. v. Department of LaborCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  3. Scott R. Sonners, Inc. v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  4. Grothe v. OlafsonAlaska Supreme Court · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API