Legal Opinion

Glastonbury Education Ass'n v. Freedom of Information Commission

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided July 12, 1994No. 12493PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHeiman, J.

The defendant1 freedom of information commission (FOIC) appeals from the judgments2 of the trial court sustaining the plaintiffs’3 appeals from the defendant’s decisions. On appeal, the defendant claims that the trial court improperly found that the arbitra*113tion proceedings between the Glastonbury education association (GEA) and the Glastonbury board of education (board) were not subject to the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA); General Statutes § 1-15 et seq.; and in doing so failed to follow the applicable scope of judicial review. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

The following…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. American Universal Insurance v. DelGrecoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  2. Griffin Hospital v. Commission on Hospitals & Health CareSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
  3. West Hartford Interfaith Coalition, Inc. v. Town CouncilSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  4. Mazur v. BlumSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  5. Weinberg v. ARA Vending Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Gil v. Courthouse OneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  2. Glastonbury Education Ass'n v. Freedom of Information CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  3. State Board of Labor Relations v. Freedom of Information CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  4. State Board of Labor Relations v. Freedom of Information CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
  5. State v. GainesConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API