Legal Opinion
Glastonbury Education Ass'n v. Freedom of Information Commission
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided August 8, 1995No. 15049PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, C. J.
The sole issue in this certified appeal is whether the Appellate Court properly concluded that, in the circumstances of this case, compulsory arbitration proceedings under the Teacher Negotiation Act (TNA); General Statutes § 10-153a et seq.; are exempt from the public meeting requirement of the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA); General Statutes §§ l-18a and 1-21;1 because they constitute “strategy or nego*706tiations with respect to collective bargaining.” The complainants, Kathleen Stack and James Hallas, the editor and the publisher of the Glastonbury Citizen newspaper, filed a complaint with…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Wilson v. Freedom of Information CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Rose v. Freedom of Information CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Perkins v. Freedom of Information CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Board of Education v. Freedom of Information CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Carofano v. City of BridgeportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Gil v. Courthouse OneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Board of Selectmen v. Freedom of Information CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- State Board of Labor Relations v. Freedom of Information CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Domestic Violence Services of Greater New Haven, Inc. v. Freedom of Information CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Department of Public Safety v. Freedom of Information CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.