Legal Opinion

Reger v. Southern Pacific Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 13, 1922No. Civ. No. 2467PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinch, P. J.

This appeal is from a judgment in favor of plaintiffs for damages sustained in a railroad crossing accident.

Defendant’s railroad runs north and south through the city of Chico. Fifth Street crosses the railroad at right angles. Defendant’s depot is immediately north of the street and its west wall is forty-four and one-half feet east of the easterly rail of the main-line track. Projecting from the west wall is a small extension window. Prom the photographs brought up, it appears that the distance from the west side of the window to the nearest rail is at least forty feet. The accident…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Griffin v. San Pedro, Los Angeles & Salt Lake RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Donnelly v. San Francisco Bridge Co.California Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Koch v. Southern California Ry. Co.California Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Elias v. . Lehigh Valley R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1919
  5. Harris v. San Diego Flume Co.California Supreme Court · 1891

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Jansen v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1952
  2. Garber v. Prudential InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  3. Garber v. Prudential InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API