Legal Opinion

Tilley v. King

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided May 23, 1940No. 13141, 13142PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Reid, Chief Justice.

The defendant in error filed a motion to dismiss the writ of error on the exceptions pendente lite filed by the plaintiff in error, because the assignment of error thereon in the bill of exceptions is insufficient. The exceptions pendente lite relate to the judgment overruling a motion by the plaintiff, on specified grounds, to disqualify Mr. R. R. Jones from appearing as an attorney for the propounder of the will. The evidence submitted on the motion was set out in the exceptions pendente lite. The judgment rendered by the trial judge was in part as follows : “Upon…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Clifton v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  2. Shaw v. Jones, Newton & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1909
  3. Smiley v. SmileySupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
  4. May v. SorrellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
  5. Alexander v. ChipsteadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Skelton v. SkeltonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1983
  2. Blumenfeld v. BorensteinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1981
  3. Kennedy v. Gwinnett Commercial BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
  4. Ringer v. LockhartSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
  5. Manley v. CombsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API