Legal Opinion

Walker v. Burgess

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided March 23, 1898PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Error to Circuit Court, Wayne County. Assicmpsii by A. Walker against Burgess & Napier Plaintiff had judgment, and defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the Court

Brannon, President:

The action was upon five promissory notes made by Burgess & Napier to P. S. Walker and by the latter transferred to plaintiff, A. Walker, and defendants pleaded set-offs, based on store accounts against P. S. Walker, and the plaintiff replied against the set-offs the statute of limitation of three years. Thus two questions arise: (1) Is three years the bar, under section 6, chapter 104, Code 1891, which was in force when the set-offs accrued, and also when the action began, or five years under chapter 2, Acts 1895, amending said section, which act was in force whenthe plea…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. MinesWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Fowler v. Lewis's Adm'rWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Stewart v. VandervortWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Maslin's Ex'rs v. HiettWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1892
  5. McClaugherty v. CroftWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1897

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Dunfee v. ChildsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Taylor v. State Compensation CommissionerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Hinrichs v. Davenport Locomotive WorksSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
  4. Jenkins v. HeaberlinWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Burns v. HaysWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1898

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API