Legal Opinion

In Re Hospitalization of Connor J.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided March 22, 2019No. 7345 S-16847PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAASSEN, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

The superior court issued a 30-day involuntary commitment order after finding that the respondent was gravely disabled and there were no less restrictive alternatives to hospitalization. The respondent appeals, arguing that it was plain error to find he waived his statutory right to be present at the commitment hearing, that it was clear error to find there were no less restrictive alternatives, and that the commitment order should be amended to omit a finding that he posed a danger to others, a finding the superior court meant to reject.

We conclude that it was…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Wetherhorn v. Alaska Psychiatric InstituteAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
  2. San Diego County Health & Human Services Agency v. John L.California Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Dozier v. Haziel v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
  4. LaVigne v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Bigley v. Alaska Psychiatric InstituteAlaska Supreme Court · 2009

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. In the Matter of the Necessity for the Hospitalization of Danielle B.Alaska Supreme Court · 2019
  2. In the Matter of the Necessity for the Hospitalization of: Tonja P.Alaska Supreme Court · 2023
  3. Native Village of Kwinhagak v. State of Alaska, DHSS, OCSAlaska Supreme Court · 2024
  4. In the Matter of the Necessity for the Hospitalization of: Sergio F.Alaska Supreme Court · 2023
  5. Tuluksak Native Community v. State of Alaska, DHSS, OCSAlaska Supreme Court · 2023

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API