Reynolds v. Alcorn
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
COUNTISS, Justice.
This appeal by Beth Burnett Reynolds (hereafter “Reynolds”) from a summary judgment in favor of appellee, Dixie Keen Alcorn (hereafter “Alcorn”) requires us to determine whether Reynolds’ suit is barred by the statute of limitations. We conclude that it is, because Reynolds failed as a matter of law to exercise diligence in securing service on Alcorn, and affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The undisputed facts developed by the summary judgment evidence reveal the following sequence of events. On September 25,1974 in Lubbock, Texas, Reynolds was a passenger in an…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1979
- Great American Reserve Insurance Co. v. San Antonio Plumbing Supply Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1965
- Zale Corporation v. RosenbaumTexas Supreme Court · 1975
- Rigo Manufacturing Company v. ThomasTexas Supreme Court · 1970
- Buie v. CouchCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Perry v. Kroger Stores, Store No. 119, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1987
- Weaver v. E-Z Mart Stores, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1997
- Webster v. Thomas, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1999
- Hansler v. Mainka, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1991
- Southern County Mutual Insurance Co. v. Ochoa, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2000
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.