Legal Opinion

Reeves v. Caldwell

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 2, 1937No. 25313PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWelch, J.

The controlling question here occurs on a resale tax deed which the plaintiff in error and plaintiff below alleges to be void. The trial court held this deed to be valid, and rendered judgment for defendants.

Plaintiff asserts the deed is void for several reasons hereinafter noted. However, in the outset we observe that in McGrath v. Rorem, 123 Okla. 163, 252 P. 418, this court held valid a resale tax deed by the same treasurer following sale of other land at the same general resale, and which deed was quite similar to, if not identical with, this deed as to execution and recitations.

Plaintiff…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Swan v. KuehnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  2. Hatchett v. GoingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  3. McGrath v. RoremSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  4. Adams v. RogersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  5. Felt v. SchaubSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Swearingen v. McCartanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  2. Moore v. BarkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  3. Patteson v. MyersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  4. King v. SlepkaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
  5. Davis v. FarissSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API